Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
×



Details

Submitted on
July 6, 2013
Image Size
65.1 KB
Resolution
1125×900
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
2,196
Favourites
46 (who?)
Comments
151
Downloads
3
×
Communist Double Standard by RTJDudek Communist Double Standard by RTJDudek
:iconrtjdudek:

Communist Double Standardby RTJDudek

Digital Art / Mixed Media / Political©2013-2015 RTJDudek
Based on mine and my watchers' experiences with LSD addicts, who call themselves "communists of deviantART" . The Marxist liars really believe in those lies with effort worth better cause.

Honestly, they really need to have their own program on Comedy Central. Especially since they call themselves "communists" while rejecting communist mainstream dogma: Marx's statements about private property. Think: communists deny communism. So stupid that amusing.

I would like to thank all the "useful idiots" active here, who have been inspiring me to laugh at their stupidity since 2008.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconbadmillennial:
BadMillennial Featured By Owner Apr 8, 2014
In the Soviet Union in 1989:

Income per worker was one seventh that of workers in the U.S.
Red meat and sugar were rationed;
Intake of red meat per person was half what it had been under the Tsars in 1913;
Fruits, vegetables, and household goods were unavailable;
Siberian miners had been on strike because they could not get bars of soap;
In a land of virgin forests, there was a toilet paper shortage;
Two-thirds of households had no hot water; a third had no running water at all;
A family of four was forced to live in an 8ft-by-8ft room.
Reply
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Apr 9, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Yet many fools consider such economical crisis as perfect appeasement of all the human needs.
Reply
:iconbadmillennial:
BadMillennial Featured By Owner Apr 9, 2014
Insanity is best defined when one expects different results from the same, endless routine.
Reply
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Apr 10, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Agreed.
Reply
:iconbadmillennial:
BadMillennial Featured By Owner Apr 10, 2014

I wouldn't even "honor" that loser with a second of my time.

Reply
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Apr 11, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Some madmen need lessons to be taught, such as here comments.deviantart.com/1/4458… .

Of course I'm aware that tinfoil hat won't learn, but people seeing his self-contradictions will do learn - that madmen shouldn't be allowed to use the Internet.
Reply
:iconbadmillennial:
BadMillennial Featured By Owner Apr 11, 2014
But let him be a lesson to us; barring him from using the Internet would make things rosier, but it's exactly the very thing "they'd" want to us rational minds. Either ignore him, or shoot him.
Reply
:iconeiseniafoetida:
EiseniaFoetida Featured By Owner Apr 8, 2014
Some of these points may be more or less true but i dont really understand some of theme like the connection between communism and LSD or Chaos. Werent communist known for trying to overorganize everything and plan it through? Whether that worked or not wouldnt Order actually be more fitting than Chaos? And i dont get the WAR is PEACE thing...
I think all in all it is a little oversimplifying things. Many of those points could be used in the same way for christianity or capitalism or democracy or imperialism and many other things.
Reply
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Apr 8, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
i dont really understand some of theme like the connection between communism and LSD or Chaos - Because you have not met your brethren behaving as if they take LSD. Since their modus operandi is chaotic, they deserve being described as such. Some examples: :iconthe-necromancer: , :icongodofwarlover: , :iconcomradesch: , :iconbttlrp: or :iconvalendale:  - they all behave as I wrote above.

Whether that worked or not wouldnt Order actually be more fitting than Chaos? - Utopian communism strives for chaos. Lenin and his followers discovered, that chaos is impossible to imply, so they built order of totalitarian state of evil; though fools mentioned above still strive for chaos.

I think all in all it is a little oversimplifying things. - Since you consider viewing people as they behave as "oversimplifying things" , it means you have crippled perception.

Many of those points could be used in the same way for christianity or capitalism or democracy or imperialism and many other things. - Marx based his lies on twisted version of Christianity and democracy, while his disciples proved that communism is red imperialism.
Reply
:iconantircczealot:
AntiRCCZealot Featured By Owner Feb 14, 2014  Student Traditional Artist
And I just don't know why... those who claim to support the North Korean regime to show how "anti-imperialist", "anti-Zionist" or "anti-Fascist" they really are even watch Japanese anime or read manga, which is considered most offensive and heinous and worst crime in North Korea... If they were really serious about it, they wouldn't even dare to look any of the "bourgeoisie" stuff. Like you said, Marxism is clearly a mental and social disorder, the Opiate of the Masses itself. :D 
Reply
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Feb 15, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Because Marxism is built on self-contradictions, which don't even form reason-reaction constructions. Instead, they lead to nonsense about human nature and mechanisms ruling this world; communist theist anti-theism is just an example of this nonsense. :giggle:
Reply
:iconmylittletripod:
MyLittleTripod Featured By Owner Jan 17, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
What do you think of the idea of a Stateless, Moneyless, Classless society?
Reply
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Jan 17, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
One big utopia impossible to imply.
Reply
:iconkamenpikachu007:
kamenpikachu007 Featured By Owner Jan 5, 2014
um... I'm a communist and I don't agrree with any of these points
Reply
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Jan 6, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Which means you are communist anti-communist. Same hypocrisy like you performed here comments.deviantart.com/1/3906… and here comments.deviantart.com/1/4099…
Reply
:icondaxterboyawesome:
DaxterBoyAwesome Featured By Owner Sep 17, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Uhm hey listen this isnt exactly correct....the Marxist way was a very great time for my country and it was a whole lot better than it is now after the civil war (Just so you know im talking about the Bosnian war so there isnt any misunderstanding =) ) Sure there was some bad things but that wasnt something horrifying (There was no slavery and we were a peaceful country) Then all of a sudden the neigbouring countries attacked us because "We were Communist Muslims and we should die" Now just to make it clear! Im not religious and despise politics! But many good people i knew died for such nonsense and not every communist and/or muslim is an crazy lunatic terrorist that wants to dominate the world.
Reply
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Sep 17, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Just because you lived well under Marxist tyranny, it does not mean the oppressed by Marxism were happy. Think about people, who were murdered by Russian communists between 1917 and 1991, by the Chinese communists since 1937 till today, by the North Korean communists, by Cuban communists and by Che Guevara and his henchmen.

Besides, have a look at your comment: true utopian communists should care about everyone, not themselves only, while you limit your care to your nation, while communist dogma says that nationalism is crime against communist mainstream.

So, I take you consider yourself as an advocate of communism, who is anti-communist at the same time. Nice hypocrisy from your side. :lol:
Reply
:icondaxterboyawesome:
DaxterBoyAwesome Featured By Owner Sep 17, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
A) Tyranny? Excuse me but who are you to judge that if you didnt live that life? We werent Russians i told you! We are Bosnians,and the Bosnians choosed the peaceful way of Marxism not the Russian one! There is a big difference.

B) Yes it is a crime to communism to have more than 1 political group because of the people. Besides the people loved their leader Josip Broz Tito because he wanted to protect his country from the Nazis and wanted a peaceful solution with the Serbs and Croats. That doesnt sound like tyranny to me.

Hypocrisy,Lycanthropy meh! For all i care i dont give a damn about any politic side! Communism,Democratics,Republic people,screw that! The world is better without it! Look what it caused! And Religion? Even worse!
Reply
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Sep 17, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
A) Tyranny? Excuse me but who are you to judge that if you didnt live that life? - how about relationships of people, who did experience it on their own ? My grandfather was tortured by the Bolsheviks for being in the Polish Resistance during WW2 - he was beaten to unconsciousness, starved, had his nails pulled out and was burnt with fiery iron, I got his story from my grandmother.

We are Bosnians,and the Bosnians choosed the peaceful way of Marxism not the Russian one! There is a big difference. - Does it mean you disbanded private property ? No. Does it mean you forbid people being religious ? I doubt. So you Bosnians made up Marxist-like regime, not genuine Marxism. This is also a difference.

Besides the people loved their leader Josip Broz Tito because he wanted to protect his country from the Nazis and wanted a peaceful solution with the Serbs and Croats. That doesnt sound like tyranny to me. - I have met Croatians and Slovenians, who were not fond of Tito and his rule of harsh yoke.

For all i care i dont give a damn about any politic side! - So why are you giving that damn about politics, huh ? :lol:

The world is better without it! Look what it caused! - So why are you defending communism and Tito then ? :laughing:
Reply
:icondaxterboyawesome:
DaxterBoyAwesome Featured By Owner Sep 17, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Polish! Not Bosnians! Big difference!

You are a little confused and i try to tell you. Religion was allowed in my country even during that time. We were different! Stop mixing us with everybody else besides communism doesnt exist in my country anymore but i protect those who were.

Harsh rule? And what exactly was this harsh rule? Croats and Serbs killed thousands of muslims without any mercy and we are the bad guys? WHERE IS THE LOGIC IN THAT???

I dont! Its the innocent people i care about.

Because Tito was a good man who protected and loved his people and whatever other tell you are lies. Tell me. If a some random stranger from a whole different country suddenly said that your leader was a sadistic lunatic fool. Would you belive him? And look at that smug laugh...Hardy har har strange political person! Hail the Jesterians!
Reply
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Sep 17, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
:laughing: And I get if from a guy, who cannot be trusted at all. Proofs comments.deviantart.com/1/3906… & comments.deviantart.com/1/3956…

Sure, accuse me of lack of logic, while I gave you proofs that YOU LACK LOGIC in argumentation. Fine, you want to fool me, but so far, you are fooling yourself and no one else. :lol:
Reply
:icondaxterboyawesome:
DaxterBoyAwesome Featured By Owner Sep 17, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Im at least more trustworthy than you.....:iconburnplz:

You just gave me crap! That aint proof! How exactly am i fooling myself?......Great Arceus you are a strange figure!  :iconjesterinsignaplz: Who cares about the non-beliver? He aint nothing of yer concern!

You know what Jess? Apsolutely correct! To Hades with this Earth! TO JESTECIA AND BEYOND!!
Reply
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Sep 17, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Confess: you are mad because I unveiled your hypocrisy. LOL
Reply
:iconmaster-of-the-boot:
Master-of-the-Boot Featured By Owner Aug 18, 2013  Hobbyist Writer
Well for starters, you're intention seems to be slander. That you call the deviant art communists LSD addicts speaks low of you. You've set up a fine straw man here
Reply
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Aug 19, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
:lol: Said the guy, who admits being moron himself comments.deviantart.com/1/3910… .
Reply
:iconargussov:
Argussov Featured By Owner Aug 5, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
This is actually true, but make the same about capitalist. I don't like them both. 
Reply
:iconl33tl3boy:
L33tl3boy Featured By Owner Aug 9, 2013
Capitalism isn't supporting Stalin you idiot.
Reply
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Aug 5, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
The funniest is that all those commie rules apply to you. :lol:
Reply
:iconargussov:
Argussov Featured By Owner Aug 5, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
I feel like blocking you sometimes.
Reply
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Aug 5, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Not my fault you are such an idiot. :lol:
Reply
:icon1980goldclick:
1980goldclick Featured By Owner Jul 23, 2013
There is actually a club on deviant art called "Da Communists"... WOW.
Reply
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Jul 24, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Wrong: there are at least 3 clubs like that. All with same members and same lies posted.
Reply
Flagged as Spam
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Jul 21, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
So-called "Christian communists" are hypocrites - Karl Marx, the creator of communism, said "Religion is opium for people, it must be eradicated". And Christianity is religion, right ?
Reply
:iconeiseniafoetida:
EiseniaFoetida Featured By Owner Apr 8, 2014
True, but I think Karl Marx isnt too wrong with that statement, is he? I mean Christianity was used for a long time by the european monarchs and the catholic church to keep the people calm.
The living conditions during the Middle Ages where shit. People lived in crappy shacks, where tormented by deseases and worked all day until they died. All that while catholik priests and the monarchs lived in big palaces and got fat stuffing them selves with meat and wine.
So when people asked them about all this shit going on, they told them: "Well, life is shit. In fact our earthly life is just trial for the afterlife. So dont be lazy and go back to work. Oh, and we are assigned by god to spread his word and to tend to his holy palaces... and wear these awesome goldrings, drink this tasty whine and eat this insaly delicious tasting steak. Hey! And dont forget to be humble! And before I forget it, if you want to burn a few years less in hell just give me some of your money. Only ten bucks? Well better than nothing but it wont help much. Try working harder next time, my son. God loves you... but he will roast your skinny ass if you dont do what he tells you. Or what we tell you because he has better things to do than talk to you and we know what he wants."
I think it is pretty obvious that Christianity was used as an excuse to exploit the people. So in that way I believe Marx was right with his statement.
Reply
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Apr 8, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
True, but I think Karl Marx isnt too wrong with that statement, is he? I mean Christianity was used for a long time by the european monarchs and the catholic church to keep the people calm. - Enlighten me: what do wrong deeds performed by communists have, that wrong deeds performed by Christians lack ? Pope John Paul II did apologize for Spanish inquisition and similar abuses, while government cannot be viewed as unity with people. Since you cannot distinguish those, it means you are suffering from debilitating mental disorder.

The living conditions during the Middle Ages where shit. People lived in crappy shacks, where tormented by deseases and worked all day until they died. All that while catholik priests and the monarchs lived in big palaces and got fat stuffing them selves with meat and wine. - If you compare the way Lenin, Stalin, Mao and Kim Dynasty lived with conditions their slaves have been living, you will notice that there was no progress. On the condition you are mentally sane, in which I doubt.

So when people asked them about all this shit going on, they told them: "Well, life is shit. In fact our earthly life is just trial for the afterlife. So dont be lazy and go back to work. Oh, and we are assigned by god to spread his word and to tend to his holy palaces... and wear these awesome goldrings, drink this tasty whine and eat this insaly delicious tasting steak. Hey! And dont forget to be humble! And before I forget it, if you want to burn a few years less in hell just give me some of your money. Only ten bucks? Well better than nothing but it wont help much. Try working harder next time, my son. God loves you... but he will roast your skinny ass if you dont do what he tells you. Or what we tell you because he has better things to do than talk to you and we know what he wants." - It seems you hate religious people, because they have been living in wealth you envy them, yet you are too lazy to work yourself for it. How childish of you. :lol:

I think it is pretty obvious that Christianity was used as an excuse to exploit the people. So in that way I believe Marx was right with his statement. - Wrong: you envy Christians their wealth, as I stated above.
Reply
:iconeiseniafoetida:
EiseniaFoetida Featured By Owner Apr 9, 2014
Wow...
"Enlighten me: what do wrong deeds performed by communists have, that wrong deeds performed by Christians lack ?" I am aware of the things that happend during the communist regimes of the last century. And I know that Stalin was an asshole and not any better than Hitler. I know that Che Guevara and Fidel Castro established Labour - or concentration camps. And of couse I now of the abuse of people in North Korea. I personally know people who fled the GDR to escape their regime. I know that Communism nowadays is an Utopia.
But I wasnt talking about Communism but about Church and the comment of Karl Marx on it. Not more not less.

"Pope John Paul II did apologize for Spanish inquisition and similar abuses, while government cannot be viewed as unity with people. Since you cannot distinguish those, it means you are suffering from debilitating mental disorder." Well, an apology is nice and all and I do believe that the catholic church is acting much more humanely nowadays but that doesnt relativize their past crimes against humanity. The Church helped to legitimate the rule of the Monarchs. And the Pope still is the last absolutistic monarch in europe. 

"If you compare the way Lenin, Stalin, Mao and Kim Dynasty lived with conditions their slaves have been living, you will notice that there was no progress. On the condition you are mentally sane, in which I doubt."
Ok... I dont really see why my previous comment makes me insane. But I'll just ignore that for now.
And you are right all these communist dictators didnt do any better. But as mentioned above, I dont talk about them.

"It seems you hate religious people, because they have been living in wealth you envy them, yet you are too lazy to work yourself for it. How childish of you. LOL" & " Wrong: you envy Christians their wealth, as I stated above"
That isnt even an argument its just an assumption. I dont envy them believe me, golden robes arent really my taste (but i think starting a discussion based on assumptions on such a level would be childish), and I certainly dont hate religious people. Maybe I dislike some of the heads of religious institutions. Especially the people who where the heads of the catholik Church in the past.

I just dont get how you can hate communists so much while you, without hesitation, defend an institution which has abused people for more than 1000 years (Crusades, Indulgence, Inquisition and holding back progress in science and philosophy with brutality and violence).
But seeing you, stalking peoples profiles and calling people insane without reason and argument, I come to believe that this isnt a political discussion you can take seriously. I have the feeling you are just starting discussions trying to provoke some people not to prove a political point or to convince them.

But I will not lower myself on the level of making insulting assumptions about your personality.

Prove me wrong and try explaining to me where Karl Marx was wrong with his comment without telling me I am insane and without weird assumptions and provocations.
Reply
:iconl33tl3boy:
L33tl3boy Featured By Owner Apr 22, 2014
HAHAHA Belgian shit-eater is jealous HAHAHA he can't draw HAHAHA he has shit between ears HAHAHA What an idiot from Belgium HAHAHA
Reply
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Apr 9, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
I am aware of the things that happend during the communist regimes of the last century. And I know that Stalin was an asshole and not any better than Hitler. I know that Che Guevara and Fidel Castro established Labour - or concentration camps. And of couse I now of the abuse of people in North Korea. I personally know people who fled the GDR to escape their regime. I know that Communism nowadays is an Utopia.
But I wasnt talking about Communism but about Church and the comment of Karl Marx on it. Not more not less.
- I have reasons to consider this statement of yours as testifying lie.

Well, an apology is nice and all and I do believe that the catholic church is acting much more humanely nowadays but that doesnt relativize their past crimes against humanity. The Church helped to legitimate the rule of the Monarchs. And the Pope still is the last absolutistic monarch in europe. - Denial of apologies and their good deeds also proves your debilitating mental disorder, same with blaming Christianity as the only factor of rule of monarchs. Think about Muslim caliphs and Shinto emperors you omitted, none of them ever apologized for horrible deeds they performed.

Ok... I dont really see why my previous comment makes me insane. But I'll just ignore that for now. - All your testimonies you have left me sound insane, especially those you unveil your double standard.

And you are right all these communist dictators didnt do any better. But as mentioned above, I dont talk about them. - Because you consider their deeds as better evil than evil of those you disagree with. Another proof for you suffering from debilitating mental disorder.

That isnt even an argument its just an assumption. I dont envy them believe me, golden robes arent really my taste (but i think starting a discussion based on assumptions on such a level would be childish), and I certainly dont hate religious people. Maybe I dislike some of the heads of religious institutions. Especially the people who where the heads of the catholik Church in the past. - As I stated above, you envy the church its wealth and you are mad I caught you on that. Childish again.

I just dont get how you can hate communists so much while you, without hesitation, defend an institution which has abused people for more than 1000 years (Crusades, Indulgence, Inquisition and holding back progress in science and philosophy with brutality and violence). - No wonder why you cannot understand that - madmen like you have perception crippled by mental disorder similar to schizophrenia.

But seeing you, stalking peoples profiles and calling people insane without reason and argument, I come to believe that this isnt a political discussion you can take seriously. - See ? I cannot take you seriously for stalking me and proving yourself being insane hypocrite without logical reasoning as you are behaving.

I have the feeling you are just starting discussions trying to provoke some people not to prove a political point or to convince them. - Just like you are doing. I would ask, what do your beliefs have than mine lack, if I was not aware that you have no idea, what are you talking about.

But I will not lower myself on the level of making insulting assumptions about your personality. - But you have already done that. Nice hypocrisy from your side.

Prove me wrong and try explaining to me where Karl Marx was wrong with his comment without telling me I am insane and without weird assumptions and provocations. - Sure thing, despite I doubt you will be able understanding this due to your lack of mental health:

1) Mikhail Bakunin observed how rather than discussion of issues, the tried and tested method of leftism and Marxism was spread through the art of character assassination, [5] close associates of Marx were adept in the art of "cowardly, odious and perfidious insinuations. They seldom make open accusation, but they insinuate, saying they "have heard - it is said - it may not be true, but', and then they hurl the most abominable calumnies in your face. " - I agree with Bakunin.

2) Marx's view on religion is mostly based on Ludwig Feuerbach's ideas[6], and his feelings toward the subject are not entirely clear. Marx is considered very controversial in religious circles for his statement, "Religion...is the opiate of the masses," yet he also stated that religion is "the heart of a heartless world." This was written in his 1843 work "A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right" and expresses Marx's belief that religion offers a false palliative to assuage the suffering of "the oppressed." During the Russian Revolution, the Russian Communist Party was highly critical of religion (likely seeing it as a threat to their Marxist agenda) and, after taking over, sought to destroy all forms of it. - This does not require commentary.

3)Karl Marx is often labeled an anti-Semite or a "self-hating Jew" for statements such as, "Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist", "The god of the Jews has become secularized and has become the god of the world. The bill of exchange is the real god of the Jew. His god is only an illusory bill of exchange", and "What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money." - Since your idol Marx was Semite anti-Semite, he was totally insane.

4) The first thing Marx wanted to remove from the economy was the Profit Motive: it gives people an incentive to make their own decisions. In short, your idol Marx claimed that people should work without motivation, which proves that Marxism in bunch of nonsense.

5) www.conservapedia.com/Similari… - proof that communism and Nazism have much in common.

6) From a conservative perspective, Marxist socialism is an economic system whereby the means of production are seized and monopolized by the government sometimes without compensation to the builders of the capital. Investments, production, distribution, income, prices, and economic justice are administered by a government nomenklatura that regulates the transfer of money, goods (including capital goods), and services primarily through taxation, regulation and aggressive institutionalized coercion.

However, some socialists reject this description. Democratic socialists advocate a system of governance based on the principles of solidarity, equality and liberty, viewing these principles as interconnected. They believe increased socio-economic equality is associated with increased practical freedom to fulfill human potential. In many countries, such as Britain, socialist movements have been built on Christian, democratic and co-operative bases, embracing the notion that individuals should 'treat others as they would wish to be treated', and arguing that all individuals have a moral responsibility for the welfare of other members of their society. Socialism seeks to prioritize human welfare over other goals, such as profit and wealth accumulation by elites; it views increased redistribution of wealth as vital to securing greater freedom and happiness for the bulk of the people. Though this rosy picture of socialism is appealing to many, it ignores what Hayek called "the road to serfdom." Though in theory socialism is an idealized, egalitarian form of economics, in practice it means rule by labor bosses who minimize individualism and economic growth in the name of equality and benefits for the working class.

Karl Marx considered socialism to be a transitory stage between capitalism and communism. In his view, socialism is summed up by the expression: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." A major criticism of socialism is that it infringes individual rights in favor of the populace. In a very real sense, politics in the Western World throughout the 20th century was shaped by the conflict between socialist and capitalist governmental policies.

Although socialist parties are common in Europe, the leading examples all currently embrace some free enterprise, individual property rights and certain other aspects of capitalism although leading European Socialists are very critical of America. In many European countries socialism has been changing to Social democracy.- As you see, Marxism is one huge utopia without logical reasoning.

7)

Friedrich Hayek and Ludwig von Mises were important critics of socialism, particularly regarding what is known as the Socialist Calculation Debate. Hayek and Mises argued that a socialist economy would face information constraints that would prevent even well intentioned planners from efficiently allocating resources. That is, the planners would not know how much a battleship or a hospital cost, and could not efficiently allocate resources among different choices. This criticism should be considered as compatible with, but independent of, criticisms based on Public choice theory that bring into consideration the incentives of political actors.

Svetlana Kunin, who lived in the Soviet Union until 1980 explains how the system worked:



- Life in the USSR modeled the socialist ideal. God-based religion was suppressed and replaced with cultlike adoration for political figures....Only the ruling class of communist leaders had access to special stores, medicine and accommodations that could compare to those in the West. The rest of the citizenry had to deal with permanent shortages of food and other necessities, and had access to free but inferior, unsanitary and low-tech medical care.

- USSR, 1959: I am a "young pioneer" in school. History classes remind us that there is a higher authority than their parents and teachers: the leaders of the Communist Party.

-Those who left Russia found a different set of values in America: freedom of religion, speech, individual pursuits, the right to private property and free enterprise....These opportunities let the average immigrant live a better life than many elites in the Soviet Communist Party...

- The slogans of "fairness and equality" sound better than the slogans of capitalism. But unlike at the beginning of the 20th century, when these slogans and ideas were yet to be tested, we have accumulated history and reality.[36]

A government which adheres to economic socialistic principles also tends to have cultures which prize unmerited equality among citizen and criminal alike, and through extension of socialistic welfare policies, between the chronically employed and the chronically unemployed, by ensuring both groups receive income though only one group works for income. This enables people otherwise healthy to not seek gainful employment because they will receive income no matter their actions, thus providing no incentive to produce. The economies of socialistic governments are thus weak and riddled with flaws, such as expecting increased production from a reduced workforce, and when engendered with a progressive culture, which simply means people who do are the same as people who do not, eventually fall under the weight of their own poorly managed and over-extended public welfare institutions. Public welfare also decreases personal charity, thus making the people dependent on the aid of the government since charitable aid, such as from a church, is discouraged by the secular nature of socialistic nations.

Socialists occasionally appeal to the fact that God, in the Old Testament, commanded His own nation to surrender a tenth of its proceeds for the maintenance of the priests and for the care of the sickly and weak. But, while fallen men, and their secular and pagan nations, shall always struggle to understand the righteous balances between government and liberty.[37] (i.e., between local and national logistics, as well as between the logistics of the individual person and those of his community) the mark of socialism is the general allowance for a naive, and willingly ignorant, adult sub-population whose members prefer, despite the limitations imposed by bureaucratic accountability, to live under all the securities rightly afforded in the fallen world only to infants. In the unfallen world, such security was a given for all persons, but without any of the bureaucracy required in the fallen world for maintaining it. In the fallen world, such security is an unattainable ideal, so that the more is done to attain it, the more the society suffers under the requisite bureaucracy. And, while the initial policy made toward that ideal is the creation of an executive class or executive vocation, such as monarchies and professional armies [38][39], there is a 'tipping point' in the creation of bureaucratic entities beyond which any civilization cannot help but increasingly lose its footing in the struggle to balance all its righteous human interests. The result is an ever-increasing proportion of that civilization's total population which, for all variety of reasons, becomes enslaved to their own demands for that ideal of security. When there is no judge who judges righteously, when all the people make the laws, and when the power of money is used to try to stay ahead of the natural consequences of unrighteousness, the 'bad money' cannot help but drive out the 'good money', until the 'Bank of Reality' is forced to call in the loan, and the civilization implodes to the point that it falls victim also to militant invaders and, or, to unmanageable internal unrest.[37] - Another proof that Marxism cannot work as if should.


Supporting illogical utopia without logical consequence like Marxism is does make you madman, since you obviously have no idea, what are you talking about. Having seen you being mad at me for telling you the truth, I ask: since you hate the truth, will you be mad if I tell you that 2+2=4 ? Rules of logic imply, that you should be mad at me for telling that, unless your debilitating mental disorder forbids you understanding simple maths.

Reply
:iconeiseniafoetida:
EiseniaFoetida Featured By Owner Apr 19, 2014
First of all thank you for your detailed comment on Communism. I learned quite a few things I wasnt aware of before. And I apologize if I offended you in my previous comment.

Ok, now I think I have to make one thing clear again. I am not a communist, and I hate Stalin, Mao, Kim Jong-Un just as much as any other totalitarian dictator. So you dont have to put such an effort in proving to me that Communism is an Utopia, even though I appreciate the sheer amount of information you provided.


Still my point was and is that Karl Marx (who is not my idol), even if he was a lunatic, was right with his statement: "Religion is the opiate of the masses" (And with that I dont want to say that any other statement of his must be true).

Religion is insofar similar to an opiate, that it can give you a warm and secure feeling in times of trouble. And that of course is great in my opinion. But I think nobody would have a problem with opiates if they would just give you nice warm feelings. One of many problems of opiates is that it makes you ignore the trouble around you. And that sadly applies for religion too. And to be clear, with that I mean every religion, not just the Catholic Church.  
One example for that would be, when in Calcutta (India) poisonous waste was disposed to the slums which lead to to whole families dying under miserable circumstances. Of course the people where furious and wanted the responsible people to be brought to justice. The advice Mother Teresa gave the people was to forgive them. This of course is very noble and I really do think that forgiveness is a very important value, but I believe that it is a little inappropriate in such a context. When a person, whether it is Stalin, a monarch in the 16th century or the head of a factory as in Calcutta, is responsible for the death of half the people you know I dont believe it is good to ignore his deeds and forgive him. At least not until he is put to justice.

Another similarity would be that it makes you dependent. Of course in different ways, the opiate operates chemicaly and religions mostly through fear.
Until the 1990s the Catholic Church preached that unbaptized Children would go to hell (in hindsight some priests tried to relativize this and said that the Children wouldnt go to hell, they would just have to wait some time after death before they would be allowed to go to heaven). And every Religion has some way or another to make it clear to people that it is not a good idea to disobey the "laws of god" and to show him no respect.
For example in the south of Germany there are many very religious regions, so most of the kindergartens there are run by the Church (oddly enough they arent even funded by the Church but by the government). And the problem is that parents who arent members of the Church arent allowed to put their children in these Kindergardens, so they have three options: moving away, no kindergarten for the children or joining the Church. Generally the last option is the most realistic, which in my opinion should not happen (especially when the church doesnt even pay for these institutions) in a country supporting freedom of religion . And this human right also implies the freedom not to be religious.

I am sorry that I mostly use the Catholic Church as example, but I am just the most familiar with it and it still is the biggest Religion in the World with one of the longest histories.


With all that said, I would have one point of criticism about Marx's Statement. I believe it would be much more precise if he wouldnt only talk about Religion but about all totalitarian doctrines, which would include political totalitarian systems like the Theird Reich or, oddly enough, the Soviet Union.
Reply
:iconl33tl3boy:
L33tl3boy Featured By Owner Apr 22, 2014
We have proofs you eat shit comments.deviantart.com/1/3416… , this explains your idiocy. HAHAHA
Reply
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Apr 19, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
This explains much - you cannot stand the fact that Roman Catholic church keeps gaining new members, despite much has been changing in official dogma since 1990.

Just because you fear about non-existing "church secret police" chasing you for your anti-theism, it does not mean your fears will come to reality. Currently binding Catechism of the Roman Catholic Church states, that the clergy abandoned totalitarian methods of handling ant--theists. Being able to read my comments means you should be able checking the Catechism yourself.
Reply
(1 Reply)
Flagged as Spam
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Jul 21, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Same to you.
Reply
:icontheanonymousdark:
Theanonymousdark Featured By Owner Jul 20, 2013

Not a communist but...

Point 1 and 4 are exaggerations. The USSR wanted to rule the world so there were no more wars and the communist believed that humanity is the most important thing in their world (they were hypocrites).

Reply
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Jul 20, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Blame the wannabe "comrades" active here, who believe that the points 1 & 4 are true.
Reply
:iconthewwitcher:
TheWWitcher Featured By Owner Jul 10, 2013
You just wrote history and reality in there, my friend.
This communist utopy is one of the worst creations of mankind.
Reply
:iconrtjdudek:
RTJDudek Featured By Owner Jul 11, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Somebody had to unveil their lies.
Reply
:iconcolt9591:
Colt9591 Featured By Owner Jul 9, 2013
Should add that red is better then any color.
Reply
Add a Comment: